This content has been marked as final. Show 1 reply
I am not a lawyer, so my opinion is not based upon legal precedence. However, I consult businesses, I co-owned a business in the past and also worked at the executive level for a sizeable company that at one time had three owners - so I am basing my opinion on my experience.
Additionally, I am basing my response obviously based upon what you have given here.
First, if the idea, ALL of the money are yours and you will be a daily active participant in running the business, you should have more than 51% share ownership. Even though it sounds like you plan on bringing on some high profile, people that will be active on a regular basis - everyone is replaceable. Your money is not. Meaning if the business goes south, they have lost nothing, you have lost everything.
Now depending upon what was the total amount of money you invested, this may be somewhat a mute point. For example, if you only had to invest $1000 then not as big of a deal than if you had to invest $10,000s or greater.
If you have already given the web designer 49% of the business, you have to give away a portion of your remaining 51% to the new third party with the rolodex? This will make the web designer (although loyal and hard working) the majority owner in the company that you funded.
The other factors that can alter an appropriate split on shares in a business are:
Payout of dividends
Types of shares (preferred versus non-preferred)
Who gives up shares in the future if you want to give share to other investors or employees / executives in the future
What happens with the shares if a shareholder leaves the company
I recommend that you draft out a document that addresses all of these issues along with how many shares currently exist and the value of the shares.
Hope this helps.
The Solopreneur's Guide