8.
Re: Is a logo important for a website? Jan 31, 2008 5:03 PM
Nat, to offer an unscientific explanation, the brain essentially treats a company name as a word or phrase, and a company logo as a picture. It attaches and links different information to each, and stores and recalls each in a different way. Having both a name and logo simply gives consumers more ways to recognize, remember, and recall your brand or business identity.
In general, names are mentally linked to thoughts and factual data, while logos are linked to feelings and sensory information (repetition over time blurs that distinction, however -- for example, just the name "Enron" can trigger strong feelings and facts now, and so can the Nike "swoosh" which, for all you trivia buffs, was created in 1971 by a freelance designer in Portland, Oregon named Caroline Davidson for a fee of $35).
It seems logical to extrapolate that the less your business relies on emotional or sensory responses from consumers, the less a logo matters. In other words, if the predominant elements that trigger people to do business with you are fact/logic-based, it probably doesn't matter if you have a logo or not.
On the other hand, can you imagine a NASCAR racer without any logos? In a number of comprehensive studies cited by NASCAR FactExpert, it has been shown that NASCAR spectators (live and television) purchase considerably more of the product brands that are advertised on NASCAR vehicles than they do of competing product brands that aren't advertised there -- and, of course, the advertising is always just a logo alone, because the available space is small and the time for viewing may be brief (not unlike a web page with a new visitor).