<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:clearspace="http://www.jivesoftware.com/xmlns/clearspace/rss" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:opensearch="http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearch/1.1/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Franchise Options</title>
    <link>http://smallbusinessonlinecommunity.bankofamerica.com/blogs/franchiseOptions</link>
    <description>Comment Feed for Franchise Options on post 'Franchising 101 (Part 2)'</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 17:42:13 GMT</pubDate>
    <generator>Clearspace 1.1.1 (http://jivesoftware.com/products/clearspace/)</generator>
    <dc:date>2007-11-05T17:42:13Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>RE: Franchising 101 (Part 2)</title>
      <link>http://smallbusinessonlinecommunity.bankofamerica.com/blogs/franchiseOptions/2007/11/05/franchising-101-part-2#comments-1576</link>
      <description>That's great advice to look for any past litigation when considering a prospective franchise. If franchisees are sueing a franchise, that is probably a good sign that there can be problems.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 17:42:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>akgold</author>
      <guid>http://smallbusinessonlinecommunity.bankofamerica.com/blogs/franchiseOptions/2007/11/05/franchising-101-part-2#comments-1576</guid>
      <dc:date>2007-11-05T17:42:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

